<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discrepencies in the genealogies of Jesus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freelancetheology.com/2009/12/20/discrepencies-in-the-genealogies-of-jesus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freelancetheology.com/2009/12/20/discrepencies-in-the-genealogies-of-jesus/</link>
	<description>don&#039;t just ask google - email your question today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon the freelance theologian</title>
		<link>http://freelancetheology.com/2009/12/20/discrepencies-in-the-genealogies-of-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon the freelance theologian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancetheology.com/?p=265#comment-288</guid>
		<description>The Aramaic Peshitta is actually a translation of the Old Testament into Aramaic (or Syriac). The Diatessaron (&#039;Gospel Harmony&#039;) is an Aramaic harmonization of the gospels written by Tatian in AD160. Given that it deliberately set out to harmonize the (pre-existing) gospel accounts (you can&#039;t harmonize things before they exist), the case for Aramaic Primacy is very unlikely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Aramaic Peshitta is actually a translation of the Old Testament into Aramaic (or Syriac). The Diatessaron (&#8216;Gospel Harmony&#8217;) is an Aramaic harmonization of the gospels written by Tatian in AD160. Given that it deliberately set out to harmonize the (pre-existing) gospel accounts (you can&#8217;t harmonize things before they exist), the case for Aramaic Primacy is very unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aramaic Scholar</title>
		<link>http://freelancetheology.com/2009/12/20/discrepencies-in-the-genealogies-of-jesus/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Aramaic Scholar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freelancetheology.com/?p=265#comment-72</guid>
		<description>These genealogies have been extensively commented on in Aramaic Primacy circles, and the Aramaic Peshitta demonstrates its superiority to the Greek New Testament in several ways. Conflicts in the genealogies are really only problems in the Greek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These genealogies have been extensively commented on in Aramaic Primacy circles, and the Aramaic Peshitta demonstrates its superiority to the Greek New Testament in several ways. Conflicts in the genealogies are really only problems in the Greek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
